<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for thoughts from a threshold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gleewood.org/threshold/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gleewood.org/threshold</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wicca, censorship, and the library by Jenett</title>
		<link>http://gleewood.org/threshold/2012/01/04/wicca-censorship-and-the-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1450</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gleewood.org/threshold/?p=1369#comment-1450</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re quite right that boards can have a tremendous amount of influence (something I touch on up above, in the &quot;Response to reasonable questions about policy, access, and changes to same.&quot; section.)That said - from actually reading the brief, the response of the librarian is not what I&#039;d expect from someone who was being pushed into filtering, but disagreed with it. It comes across much more as the response of someone who is, for whatever reason, reasonably in tune with their board on the issue. 

(If it really were a board driven policy, I&#039;d have expect to see a &quot;Our policy, determined by the board, is X&quot; sort of response, not just &quot;I won&#039;t do that.&quot;) 

Which is rather a problem when it goes so directly against the library&#039;s own mission statement, and of course, in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re quite right that boards can have a tremendous amount of influence (something I touch on up above, in the &#8220;Response to reasonable questions about policy, access, and changes to same.&#8221; section.)That said &#8211; from actually reading the brief, the response of the librarian is not what I&#8217;d expect from someone who was being pushed into filtering, but disagreed with it. It comes across much more as the response of someone who is, for whatever reason, reasonably in tune with their board on the issue. </p>
<p>(If it really were a board driven policy, I&#8217;d have expect to see a &#8220;Our policy, determined by the board, is X&#8221; sort of response, not just &#8220;I won&#8217;t do that.&#8221;) </p>
<p>Which is rather a problem when it goes so directly against the library&#8217;s own mission statement, and of course, in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wicca, censorship, and the library by Librarian</title>
		<link>http://gleewood.org/threshold/2012/01/04/wicca-censorship-and-the-library/comment-page-1/#comment-1449</link>
		<dc:creator>Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gleewood.org/threshold/?p=1369#comment-1449</guid>
		<description>In many communities, especially smaller communities, the library, its staff, and its policies may be closely controlled by the board of trustees, usually made up of members of the community. A reallly controlling board can dictate collection development policies, insist on certain types of filtering, decide whether to hire a librarian with professional credentials, and dictate to library staff how they must respond to members of the public on access issues. The story out of Salem is not unusual - we just hear about it readilys thanks to (ironically enough) - internet access.

The librarian is taking a lot of heat over this situation, but I&#039;d bet that the board is at the bottom of the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In many communities, especially smaller communities, the library, its staff, and its policies may be closely controlled by the board of trustees, usually made up of members of the community. A reallly controlling board can dictate collection development policies, insist on certain types of filtering, decide whether to hire a librarian with professional credentials, and dictate to library staff how they must respond to members of the public on access issues. The story out of Salem is not unusual &#8211; we just hear about it readilys thanks to (ironically enough) &#8211; internet access.</p>
<p>The librarian is taking a lot of heat over this situation, but I&#8217;d bet that the board is at the bottom of the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Coping with the unexpected by Coping with the Unexpected &#171; WiccanWeb</title>
		<link>http://gleewood.org/threshold/2011/12/12/coping-with-the-unexpected/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Coping with the Unexpected &#171; WiccanWeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gleewood.org/threshold/?p=1365#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ritual limits: role of the event planner by Ritual limits: role of the event planner &#171; WiccanWeb</title>
		<link>http://gleewood.org/threshold/2011/03/01/ritual-limits-role-of-the-event-planne/comment-page-1/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritual limits: role of the event planner &#171; WiccanWeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gleewood.org/threshold/?p=1219#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cliques and open rituals by BlackCatEmpathy</title>
		<link>http://gleewood.org/threshold/2008/01/07/cliques-and-open-rituals/comment-page-1/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackCatEmpathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gleewood.org/threshold/2008/01/07/cliques-and-open-rituals/#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>Thank You so much! This was very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You so much! This was very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

